Review



cdk4 6 inhibitors abemaciclib  (MedChemExpress)


Bioz Verified Symbol MedChemExpress is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol MedChemExpress manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    MedChemExpress cdk4 6 inhibitors abemaciclib
    HCT116 cells (5 × 10³ cells/well) were exposed for 48 h to increasing concentrations of (A) 5-fluorouracil (0.77–7700 μM), (B) SN-38 (0.02–200 nM), (C) oxaliplatin (0.125–250 μM), and (D) <t>the</t> <t>CDK4/6</t> inhibitors abemaciclib (25–3000 nM) or palbociclib (25–6400 nM). Cell viability was assessed by Calcein AM fluorescence and expressed as a percentage of the untreated control (100%). The data are presented as the mean ± SEM of six independent biological replicates. Dose–response curves were fitted by nonlinear regression using a four-parameter logistic model (variable slope; log[inhibitor] vs. normalized response) in GraphPad Prism 8.4.3.
    Cdk4 6 Inhibitors Abemaciclib, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 5 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cdk4 6 inhibitors abemaciclib/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 93 stars, based on 5 article reviews
    cdk4 6 inhibitors abemaciclib - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "CDK4/6 inhibitors enhance oxaliplatin efficacy in colorectal cancer with RB-dependent and tumor-selective activity in intestinal model"

    Article Title: CDK4/6 inhibitors enhance oxaliplatin efficacy in colorectal cancer with RB-dependent and tumor-selective activity in intestinal model

    Journal: bioRxiv

    doi: 10.64898/2026.04.15.718743

    HCT116 cells (5 × 10³ cells/well) were exposed for 48 h to increasing concentrations of (A) 5-fluorouracil (0.77–7700 μM), (B) SN-38 (0.02–200 nM), (C) oxaliplatin (0.125–250 μM), and (D) the CDK4/6 inhibitors abemaciclib (25–3000 nM) or palbociclib (25–6400 nM). Cell viability was assessed by Calcein AM fluorescence and expressed as a percentage of the untreated control (100%). The data are presented as the mean ± SEM of six independent biological replicates. Dose–response curves were fitted by nonlinear regression using a four-parameter logistic model (variable slope; log[inhibitor] vs. normalized response) in GraphPad Prism 8.4.3.
    Figure Legend Snippet: HCT116 cells (5 × 10³ cells/well) were exposed for 48 h to increasing concentrations of (A) 5-fluorouracil (0.77–7700 μM), (B) SN-38 (0.02–200 nM), (C) oxaliplatin (0.125–250 μM), and (D) the CDK4/6 inhibitors abemaciclib (25–3000 nM) or palbociclib (25–6400 nM). Cell viability was assessed by Calcein AM fluorescence and expressed as a percentage of the untreated control (100%). The data are presented as the mean ± SEM of six independent biological replicates. Dose–response curves were fitted by nonlinear regression using a four-parameter logistic model (variable slope; log[inhibitor] vs. normalized response) in GraphPad Prism 8.4.3.

    Techniques Used: Fluorescence, Control

    HCT116 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of chemotherapeutic agents in the absence or presence of fixed concentrations of CDK4/6 inhibitors, and cell viability was assessed by Calcein AM fluorescence and expressed as a percentage relative to the untreated control (100%). (A) 5-fluorouracil, (B) SN-38, (C) oxaliplatin, all of them alone or in combination with abemaciclib (300 nM). (D) Combination index (CI) analysis plotted as fraction affected versus CI for each drug combination with abemaciclib. The dashed line indicates CI = 1, where values <1 indicate synergism and values >1 indicate antagonism. (E) 5-fluorouracil, (F) SN-38, or (G) oxaliplatin, all of them alone or in combination with palbociclib (400 nM). (H) Combination index analysis plotted as fraction affected versus CI for each drug combination with palbociclib. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of at least three independent biological replicates. Bars are color-coded as follows: control (gray), chemotherapy alone (blue), abemaciclib alone (yellow), palbociclib alone (red), chemotherapy + abemaciclib (green), and chemotherapy + palbociclib (purple). Statistical significance was evaluated using ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by Šídák’s multiple comparisons test. Significance levels are indicated as follows: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ***p < 0.0001. To improve visual clarity, statistical comparisons between chemotherapy treatments alone (blue bars) and the untreated control (gray bar) are not shown in the graphs but are summarized here. ABE arm: A: CTL vs ABE ***p=0.0001; 5-FU 2.8 vs 2.8+ABE ***p=0.0005; 4.5 vs 4.5+ABE *p=0.0128; 6 vs 6+ABE ns. B: CTL vs ABE ****p<0.0001; SN-38 0.8 vs 0.8+ABE ***p=0.0009; 1.2 vs 1.2+ABE ***p=0.0004; 1.6 vs 1.6+ABE ns. C: CTL vs ABE ****p<0.0001; OXA 0.4 vs 0.4+ABE ****p<0.0001; 0.6 vs 0.6+ABE ****p<0.0001; 0.8 vs 0.8+ABE ns. PALB arm: E: CTL vs PALB ns; 5-FU 2.8 vs 2.8+PALB ns; PALB vs 2.8+PALB **p=0.0040; PALB vs 4.5+PALB ****p<0.0001; PALB vs 6+PALB ****p<0.0001; 6 vs 6+PALB *p=0.0463. F: CTL vs PALB **p=0.0071; SN-38 1.2 vs 1.2+PALB ***p=0.0008; 0.8 vs 0.8+PALB ns; 1.6 vs 1.6+PALB ns; PALB vs 1.2+PALB ***p=0.0002; PALB vs 1.6+PALB ***p=0.0003. G: CTL vs PALB *p=0.0478; OXA 0.4 vs 0.4+PALB ***p=0.0007; 0.6 vs 0.6+PALB ****p<0.0001; 0.8 vs 0.8+PALB **p=0.0041; PALB vs all OXA+PALB ****p<0.0001.
    Figure Legend Snippet: HCT116 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of chemotherapeutic agents in the absence or presence of fixed concentrations of CDK4/6 inhibitors, and cell viability was assessed by Calcein AM fluorescence and expressed as a percentage relative to the untreated control (100%). (A) 5-fluorouracil, (B) SN-38, (C) oxaliplatin, all of them alone or in combination with abemaciclib (300 nM). (D) Combination index (CI) analysis plotted as fraction affected versus CI for each drug combination with abemaciclib. The dashed line indicates CI = 1, where values <1 indicate synergism and values >1 indicate antagonism. (E) 5-fluorouracil, (F) SN-38, or (G) oxaliplatin, all of them alone or in combination with palbociclib (400 nM). (H) Combination index analysis plotted as fraction affected versus CI for each drug combination with palbociclib. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of at least three independent biological replicates. Bars are color-coded as follows: control (gray), chemotherapy alone (blue), abemaciclib alone (yellow), palbociclib alone (red), chemotherapy + abemaciclib (green), and chemotherapy + palbociclib (purple). Statistical significance was evaluated using ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by Šídák’s multiple comparisons test. Significance levels are indicated as follows: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ***p < 0.0001. To improve visual clarity, statistical comparisons between chemotherapy treatments alone (blue bars) and the untreated control (gray bar) are not shown in the graphs but are summarized here. ABE arm: A: CTL vs ABE ***p=0.0001; 5-FU 2.8 vs 2.8+ABE ***p=0.0005; 4.5 vs 4.5+ABE *p=0.0128; 6 vs 6+ABE ns. B: CTL vs ABE ****p<0.0001; SN-38 0.8 vs 0.8+ABE ***p=0.0009; 1.2 vs 1.2+ABE ***p=0.0004; 1.6 vs 1.6+ABE ns. C: CTL vs ABE ****p<0.0001; OXA 0.4 vs 0.4+ABE ****p<0.0001; 0.6 vs 0.6+ABE ****p<0.0001; 0.8 vs 0.8+ABE ns. PALB arm: E: CTL vs PALB ns; 5-FU 2.8 vs 2.8+PALB ns; PALB vs 2.8+PALB **p=0.0040; PALB vs 4.5+PALB ****p<0.0001; PALB vs 6+PALB ****p<0.0001; 6 vs 6+PALB *p=0.0463. F: CTL vs PALB **p=0.0071; SN-38 1.2 vs 1.2+PALB ***p=0.0008; 0.8 vs 0.8+PALB ns; 1.6 vs 1.6+PALB ns; PALB vs 1.2+PALB ***p=0.0002; PALB vs 1.6+PALB ***p=0.0003. G: CTL vs PALB *p=0.0478; OXA 0.4 vs 0.4+PALB ***p=0.0007; 0.6 vs 0.6+PALB ****p<0.0001; 0.8 vs 0.8+PALB **p=0.0041; PALB vs all OXA+PALB ****p<0.0001.

    Techniques Used: Fluorescence, Control



    Similar Products

    93
    MedChemExpress cdk4 6 inhibitors abemaciclib
    HCT116 cells (5 × 10³ cells/well) were exposed for 48 h to increasing concentrations of (A) 5-fluorouracil (0.77–7700 μM), (B) SN-38 (0.02–200 nM), (C) oxaliplatin (0.125–250 μM), and (D) <t>the</t> <t>CDK4/6</t> inhibitors abemaciclib (25–3000 nM) or palbociclib (25–6400 nM). Cell viability was assessed by Calcein AM fluorescence and expressed as a percentage of the untreated control (100%). The data are presented as the mean ± SEM of six independent biological replicates. Dose–response curves were fitted by nonlinear regression using a four-parameter logistic model (variable slope; log[inhibitor] vs. normalized response) in GraphPad Prism 8.4.3.
    Cdk4 6 Inhibitors Abemaciclib, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cdk4 6 inhibitors abemaciclib/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cdk4 6 inhibitors abemaciclib - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Pfizer Inc cyclin cdk4 6 inhibitor palbociclib
    HCT116 cells (5 × 10³ cells/well) were exposed for 48 h to increasing concentrations of (A) 5-fluorouracil (0.77–7700 μM), (B) SN-38 (0.02–200 nM), (C) oxaliplatin (0.125–250 μM), and (D) <t>the</t> <t>CDK4/6</t> inhibitors abemaciclib (25–3000 nM) or palbociclib (25–6400 nM). Cell viability was assessed by Calcein AM fluorescence and expressed as a percentage of the untreated control (100%). The data are presented as the mean ± SEM of six independent biological replicates. Dose–response curves were fitted by nonlinear regression using a four-parameter logistic model (variable slope; log[inhibitor] vs. normalized response) in GraphPad Prism 8.4.3.
    Cyclin Cdk4 6 Inhibitor Palbociclib, supplied by Pfizer Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cyclin cdk4 6 inhibitor palbociclib/product/Pfizer Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cyclin cdk4 6 inhibitor palbociclib - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Merck & Co cdk4 6 inhibitor palbociclib
    (A) Experimental setup for steady-state RNA sequencing. (B) Numbers of up- or downregulated genes (log2-fold change >1) after 24 or 48 h HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (C) Numbers of unique and shared up-regulated genes after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (D) Functional enrichment analysis (gene ontology, biological process) of genes downregulated 48 h after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (E) Functional enrichment analysis (gene ontology, biological process) of genes upregulated 48 h after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (G) Log2 fold-change in hallmark E2F target gene expression after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (H) E2F1 expression (RNAseq, DEseq2) after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. N=3. (I) Log2 fold-change in hallmark MYC target gene expression after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (J) MYC expression (RNAseq, DEseq2) after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. N=3. (K) Protein levels of pRB1 and α-TUBULIN after oncogene induction for the times indicated. (L) S phase percentage after HRAS G12V induction as determined by EdU labelling and flow cytometry. N=4. (M) S phase percentage after KRAS G12V induction. N=4. (N) S phase percentage after BRAF V600E induction. N=4. (O) Experimental setup <t>for</t> <t>CDK4/6</t> inhibitor (CDK4/6i) treatment and release. (P) S phase percentage after HRAS G12V induction and treatment with CDK4/6i. N=2. (Q) Nuclear EU intensity after HRAS G12V induction and release from CDK4/6i. N=3. (R) Average replication fork speeds after HRAS G12V induction and release from CDK4/6i. N=3. Means +/-SEM (bars) are shown with 2-way ANOVA or mixed effects analysis.
    Cdk4 6 Inhibitor Palbociclib, supplied by Merck & Co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cdk4 6 inhibitor palbociclib/product/Merck & Co
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cdk4 6 inhibitor palbociclib - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Novartis cdk4 6 inhibitors
    (A) Experimental setup for steady-state RNA sequencing. (B) Numbers of up- or downregulated genes (log2-fold change >1) after 24 or 48 h HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (C) Numbers of unique and shared up-regulated genes after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (D) Functional enrichment analysis (gene ontology, biological process) of genes downregulated 48 h after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (E) Functional enrichment analysis (gene ontology, biological process) of genes upregulated 48 h after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (G) Log2 fold-change in hallmark E2F target gene expression after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (H) E2F1 expression (RNAseq, DEseq2) after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. N=3. (I) Log2 fold-change in hallmark MYC target gene expression after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (J) MYC expression (RNAseq, DEseq2) after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. N=3. (K) Protein levels of pRB1 and α-TUBULIN after oncogene induction for the times indicated. (L) S phase percentage after HRAS G12V induction as determined by EdU labelling and flow cytometry. N=4. (M) S phase percentage after KRAS G12V induction. N=4. (N) S phase percentage after BRAF V600E induction. N=4. (O) Experimental setup <t>for</t> <t>CDK4/6</t> inhibitor (CDK4/6i) treatment and release. (P) S phase percentage after HRAS G12V induction and treatment with CDK4/6i. N=2. (Q) Nuclear EU intensity after HRAS G12V induction and release from CDK4/6i. N=3. (R) Average replication fork speeds after HRAS G12V induction and release from CDK4/6i. N=3. Means +/-SEM (bars) are shown with 2-way ANOVA or mixed effects analysis.
    Cdk4 6 Inhibitors, supplied by Novartis, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cdk4 6 inhibitors/product/Novartis
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cdk4 6 inhibitors - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    MedChemExpress cdk4 6 inhibitor
    (A) Experimental setup for steady-state RNA sequencing. (B) Numbers of up- or downregulated genes (log2-fold change >1) after 24 or 48 h HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (C) Numbers of unique and shared up-regulated genes after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (D) Functional enrichment analysis (gene ontology, biological process) of genes downregulated 48 h after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (E) Functional enrichment analysis (gene ontology, biological process) of genes upregulated 48 h after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (G) Log2 fold-change in hallmark E2F target gene expression after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (H) E2F1 expression (RNAseq, DEseq2) after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. N=3. (I) Log2 fold-change in hallmark MYC target gene expression after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (J) MYC expression (RNAseq, DEseq2) after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. N=3. (K) Protein levels of pRB1 and α-TUBULIN after oncogene induction for the times indicated. (L) S phase percentage after HRAS G12V induction as determined by EdU labelling and flow cytometry. N=4. (M) S phase percentage after KRAS G12V induction. N=4. (N) S phase percentage after BRAF V600E induction. N=4. (O) Experimental setup <t>for</t> <t>CDK4/6</t> inhibitor (CDK4/6i) treatment and release. (P) S phase percentage after HRAS G12V induction and treatment with CDK4/6i. N=2. (Q) Nuclear EU intensity after HRAS G12V induction and release from CDK4/6i. N=3. (R) Average replication fork speeds after HRAS G12V induction and release from CDK4/6i. N=3. Means +/-SEM (bars) are shown with 2-way ANOVA or mixed effects analysis.
    Cdk4 6 Inhibitor, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cdk4 6 inhibitor/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cdk4 6 inhibitor - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    G1 Therapeutics pyrimidine based cdk4 6 inhibitors
    (A) Experimental setup for steady-state RNA sequencing. (B) Numbers of up- or downregulated genes (log2-fold change >1) after 24 or 48 h HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (C) Numbers of unique and shared up-regulated genes after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (D) Functional enrichment analysis (gene ontology, biological process) of genes downregulated 48 h after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (E) Functional enrichment analysis (gene ontology, biological process) of genes upregulated 48 h after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (G) Log2 fold-change in hallmark E2F target gene expression after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (H) E2F1 expression (RNAseq, DEseq2) after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. N=3. (I) Log2 fold-change in hallmark MYC target gene expression after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (J) MYC expression (RNAseq, DEseq2) after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. N=3. (K) Protein levels of pRB1 and α-TUBULIN after oncogene induction for the times indicated. (L) S phase percentage after HRAS G12V induction as determined by EdU labelling and flow cytometry. N=4. (M) S phase percentage after KRAS G12V induction. N=4. (N) S phase percentage after BRAF V600E induction. N=4. (O) Experimental setup <t>for</t> <t>CDK4/6</t> inhibitor (CDK4/6i) treatment and release. (P) S phase percentage after HRAS G12V induction and treatment with CDK4/6i. N=2. (Q) Nuclear EU intensity after HRAS G12V induction and release from CDK4/6i. N=3. (R) Average replication fork speeds after HRAS G12V induction and release from CDK4/6i. N=3. Means +/-SEM (bars) are shown with 2-way ANOVA or mixed effects analysis.
    Pyrimidine Based Cdk4 6 Inhibitors, supplied by G1 Therapeutics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/pyrimidine based cdk4 6 inhibitors/product/G1 Therapeutics
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    pyrimidine based cdk4 6 inhibitors - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    G1 Therapeutics cdk4 6 inhibitors
    (A) Experimental setup for steady-state RNA sequencing. (B) Numbers of up- or downregulated genes (log2-fold change >1) after 24 or 48 h HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (C) Numbers of unique and shared up-regulated genes after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (D) Functional enrichment analysis (gene ontology, biological process) of genes downregulated 48 h after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (E) Functional enrichment analysis (gene ontology, biological process) of genes upregulated 48 h after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (G) Log2 fold-change in hallmark E2F target gene expression after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (H) E2F1 expression (RNAseq, DEseq2) after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. N=3. (I) Log2 fold-change in hallmark MYC target gene expression after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (J) MYC expression (RNAseq, DEseq2) after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. N=3. (K) Protein levels of pRB1 and α-TUBULIN after oncogene induction for the times indicated. (L) S phase percentage after HRAS G12V induction as determined by EdU labelling and flow cytometry. N=4. (M) S phase percentage after KRAS G12V induction. N=4. (N) S phase percentage after BRAF V600E induction. N=4. (O) Experimental setup <t>for</t> <t>CDK4/6</t> inhibitor (CDK4/6i) treatment and release. (P) S phase percentage after HRAS G12V induction and treatment with CDK4/6i. N=2. (Q) Nuclear EU intensity after HRAS G12V induction and release from CDK4/6i. N=3. (R) Average replication fork speeds after HRAS G12V induction and release from CDK4/6i. N=3. Means +/-SEM (bars) are shown with 2-way ANOVA or mixed effects analysis.
    Cdk4 6 Inhibitors, supplied by G1 Therapeutics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cdk4 6 inhibitors/product/G1 Therapeutics
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cdk4 6 inhibitors - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    HCT116 cells (5 × 10³ cells/well) were exposed for 48 h to increasing concentrations of (A) 5-fluorouracil (0.77–7700 μM), (B) SN-38 (0.02–200 nM), (C) oxaliplatin (0.125–250 μM), and (D) the CDK4/6 inhibitors abemaciclib (25–3000 nM) or palbociclib (25–6400 nM). Cell viability was assessed by Calcein AM fluorescence and expressed as a percentage of the untreated control (100%). The data are presented as the mean ± SEM of six independent biological replicates. Dose–response curves were fitted by nonlinear regression using a four-parameter logistic model (variable slope; log[inhibitor] vs. normalized response) in GraphPad Prism 8.4.3.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: CDK4/6 inhibitors enhance oxaliplatin efficacy in colorectal cancer with RB-dependent and tumor-selective activity in intestinal model

    doi: 10.64898/2026.04.15.718743

    Figure Lengend Snippet: HCT116 cells (5 × 10³ cells/well) were exposed for 48 h to increasing concentrations of (A) 5-fluorouracil (0.77–7700 μM), (B) SN-38 (0.02–200 nM), (C) oxaliplatin (0.125–250 μM), and (D) the CDK4/6 inhibitors abemaciclib (25–3000 nM) or palbociclib (25–6400 nM). Cell viability was assessed by Calcein AM fluorescence and expressed as a percentage of the untreated control (100%). The data are presented as the mean ± SEM of six independent biological replicates. Dose–response curves were fitted by nonlinear regression using a four-parameter logistic model (variable slope; log[inhibitor] vs. normalized response) in GraphPad Prism 8.4.3.

    Article Snippet: The selective CDK4/6 inhibitors abemaciclib (MedChemExpress, HY-16297A) and palbociclib (MedChemExpress, HY-A0065) were used either as single agents or in combination with one of the following chemotherapeutic agents: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; Merck, F6627), SN-38 (7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin; Cayman Chemical, 15632), and oxaliplatin (Bergamo, 1151955).

    Techniques: Fluorescence, Control

    HCT116 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of chemotherapeutic agents in the absence or presence of fixed concentrations of CDK4/6 inhibitors, and cell viability was assessed by Calcein AM fluorescence and expressed as a percentage relative to the untreated control (100%). (A) 5-fluorouracil, (B) SN-38, (C) oxaliplatin, all of them alone or in combination with abemaciclib (300 nM). (D) Combination index (CI) analysis plotted as fraction affected versus CI for each drug combination with abemaciclib. The dashed line indicates CI = 1, where values <1 indicate synergism and values >1 indicate antagonism. (E) 5-fluorouracil, (F) SN-38, or (G) oxaliplatin, all of them alone or in combination with palbociclib (400 nM). (H) Combination index analysis plotted as fraction affected versus CI for each drug combination with palbociclib. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of at least three independent biological replicates. Bars are color-coded as follows: control (gray), chemotherapy alone (blue), abemaciclib alone (yellow), palbociclib alone (red), chemotherapy + abemaciclib (green), and chemotherapy + palbociclib (purple). Statistical significance was evaluated using ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by Šídák’s multiple comparisons test. Significance levels are indicated as follows: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ***p < 0.0001. To improve visual clarity, statistical comparisons between chemotherapy treatments alone (blue bars) and the untreated control (gray bar) are not shown in the graphs but are summarized here. ABE arm: A: CTL vs ABE ***p=0.0001; 5-FU 2.8 vs 2.8+ABE ***p=0.0005; 4.5 vs 4.5+ABE *p=0.0128; 6 vs 6+ABE ns. B: CTL vs ABE ****p<0.0001; SN-38 0.8 vs 0.8+ABE ***p=0.0009; 1.2 vs 1.2+ABE ***p=0.0004; 1.6 vs 1.6+ABE ns. C: CTL vs ABE ****p<0.0001; OXA 0.4 vs 0.4+ABE ****p<0.0001; 0.6 vs 0.6+ABE ****p<0.0001; 0.8 vs 0.8+ABE ns. PALB arm: E: CTL vs PALB ns; 5-FU 2.8 vs 2.8+PALB ns; PALB vs 2.8+PALB **p=0.0040; PALB vs 4.5+PALB ****p<0.0001; PALB vs 6+PALB ****p<0.0001; 6 vs 6+PALB *p=0.0463. F: CTL vs PALB **p=0.0071; SN-38 1.2 vs 1.2+PALB ***p=0.0008; 0.8 vs 0.8+PALB ns; 1.6 vs 1.6+PALB ns; PALB vs 1.2+PALB ***p=0.0002; PALB vs 1.6+PALB ***p=0.0003. G: CTL vs PALB *p=0.0478; OXA 0.4 vs 0.4+PALB ***p=0.0007; 0.6 vs 0.6+PALB ****p<0.0001; 0.8 vs 0.8+PALB **p=0.0041; PALB vs all OXA+PALB ****p<0.0001.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: CDK4/6 inhibitors enhance oxaliplatin efficacy in colorectal cancer with RB-dependent and tumor-selective activity in intestinal model

    doi: 10.64898/2026.04.15.718743

    Figure Lengend Snippet: HCT116 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of chemotherapeutic agents in the absence or presence of fixed concentrations of CDK4/6 inhibitors, and cell viability was assessed by Calcein AM fluorescence and expressed as a percentage relative to the untreated control (100%). (A) 5-fluorouracil, (B) SN-38, (C) oxaliplatin, all of them alone or in combination with abemaciclib (300 nM). (D) Combination index (CI) analysis plotted as fraction affected versus CI for each drug combination with abemaciclib. The dashed line indicates CI = 1, where values <1 indicate synergism and values >1 indicate antagonism. (E) 5-fluorouracil, (F) SN-38, or (G) oxaliplatin, all of them alone or in combination with palbociclib (400 nM). (H) Combination index analysis plotted as fraction affected versus CI for each drug combination with palbociclib. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of at least three independent biological replicates. Bars are color-coded as follows: control (gray), chemotherapy alone (blue), abemaciclib alone (yellow), palbociclib alone (red), chemotherapy + abemaciclib (green), and chemotherapy + palbociclib (purple). Statistical significance was evaluated using ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by Šídák’s multiple comparisons test. Significance levels are indicated as follows: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ***p < 0.0001. To improve visual clarity, statistical comparisons between chemotherapy treatments alone (blue bars) and the untreated control (gray bar) are not shown in the graphs but are summarized here. ABE arm: A: CTL vs ABE ***p=0.0001; 5-FU 2.8 vs 2.8+ABE ***p=0.0005; 4.5 vs 4.5+ABE *p=0.0128; 6 vs 6+ABE ns. B: CTL vs ABE ****p<0.0001; SN-38 0.8 vs 0.8+ABE ***p=0.0009; 1.2 vs 1.2+ABE ***p=0.0004; 1.6 vs 1.6+ABE ns. C: CTL vs ABE ****p<0.0001; OXA 0.4 vs 0.4+ABE ****p<0.0001; 0.6 vs 0.6+ABE ****p<0.0001; 0.8 vs 0.8+ABE ns. PALB arm: E: CTL vs PALB ns; 5-FU 2.8 vs 2.8+PALB ns; PALB vs 2.8+PALB **p=0.0040; PALB vs 4.5+PALB ****p<0.0001; PALB vs 6+PALB ****p<0.0001; 6 vs 6+PALB *p=0.0463. F: CTL vs PALB **p=0.0071; SN-38 1.2 vs 1.2+PALB ***p=0.0008; 0.8 vs 0.8+PALB ns; 1.6 vs 1.6+PALB ns; PALB vs 1.2+PALB ***p=0.0002; PALB vs 1.6+PALB ***p=0.0003. G: CTL vs PALB *p=0.0478; OXA 0.4 vs 0.4+PALB ***p=0.0007; 0.6 vs 0.6+PALB ****p<0.0001; 0.8 vs 0.8+PALB **p=0.0041; PALB vs all OXA+PALB ****p<0.0001.

    Article Snippet: The selective CDK4/6 inhibitors abemaciclib (MedChemExpress, HY-16297A) and palbociclib (MedChemExpress, HY-A0065) were used either as single agents or in combination with one of the following chemotherapeutic agents: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; Merck, F6627), SN-38 (7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin; Cayman Chemical, 15632), and oxaliplatin (Bergamo, 1151955).

    Techniques: Fluorescence, Control

    (A) Experimental setup for steady-state RNA sequencing. (B) Numbers of up- or downregulated genes (log2-fold change >1) after 24 or 48 h HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (C) Numbers of unique and shared up-regulated genes after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (D) Functional enrichment analysis (gene ontology, biological process) of genes downregulated 48 h after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (E) Functional enrichment analysis (gene ontology, biological process) of genes upregulated 48 h after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (G) Log2 fold-change in hallmark E2F target gene expression after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (H) E2F1 expression (RNAseq, DEseq2) after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. N=3. (I) Log2 fold-change in hallmark MYC target gene expression after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (J) MYC expression (RNAseq, DEseq2) after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. N=3. (K) Protein levels of pRB1 and α-TUBULIN after oncogene induction for the times indicated. (L) S phase percentage after HRAS G12V induction as determined by EdU labelling and flow cytometry. N=4. (M) S phase percentage after KRAS G12V induction. N=4. (N) S phase percentage after BRAF V600E induction. N=4. (O) Experimental setup for CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) treatment and release. (P) S phase percentage after HRAS G12V induction and treatment with CDK4/6i. N=2. (Q) Nuclear EU intensity after HRAS G12V induction and release from CDK4/6i. N=3. (R) Average replication fork speeds after HRAS G12V induction and release from CDK4/6i. N=3. Means +/-SEM (bars) are shown with 2-way ANOVA or mixed effects analysis.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: PI3K-AKT activation determines oncogenic RAS-induced hypertranscription and replication stress

    doi: 10.64898/2026.03.16.711577

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Experimental setup for steady-state RNA sequencing. (B) Numbers of up- or downregulated genes (log2-fold change >1) after 24 or 48 h HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (C) Numbers of unique and shared up-regulated genes after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (D) Functional enrichment analysis (gene ontology, biological process) of genes downregulated 48 h after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (E) Functional enrichment analysis (gene ontology, biological process) of genes upregulated 48 h after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (G) Log2 fold-change in hallmark E2F target gene expression after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (H) E2F1 expression (RNAseq, DEseq2) after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. N=3. (I) Log2 fold-change in hallmark MYC target gene expression after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. (J) MYC expression (RNAseq, DEseq2) after HRAS G12V or KRAS G12V induction. N=3. (K) Protein levels of pRB1 and α-TUBULIN after oncogene induction for the times indicated. (L) S phase percentage after HRAS G12V induction as determined by EdU labelling and flow cytometry. N=4. (M) S phase percentage after KRAS G12V induction. N=4. (N) S phase percentage after BRAF V600E induction. N=4. (O) Experimental setup for CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) treatment and release. (P) S phase percentage after HRAS G12V induction and treatment with CDK4/6i. N=2. (Q) Nuclear EU intensity after HRAS G12V induction and release from CDK4/6i. N=3. (R) Average replication fork speeds after HRAS G12V induction and release from CDK4/6i. N=3. Means +/-SEM (bars) are shown with 2-way ANOVA or mixed effects analysis.

    Article Snippet: Small molecule inhibitors and activators were sourced as follows: MEK inhibitor PD0325901 (1 μM) and CDK4/6 inhibitor Palbociclib (1 μM) were obtained from Merck Life Science UK Limited.

    Techniques: RNA Sequencing, Functional Assay, Targeted Gene Expression, Expressing, RNA sequencing, Flow Cytometry